Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Rhonda Vetere
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Liz Read! Talk! 23:13, 18 June 2023 (UTC)
Rhonda Vetere
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- Rhonda Vetere (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Non-notable author. PR-based coverage, nothing reliable found.
talk) 18:55, 11 June 2023 (UTC)
]
- Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Businesspeople, Women, Virginia, and Washington, D.C.. Spiderone(Talk to Spider) 20:26, 11 June 2023 (UTC)
- Delete This Forbes article is a contributor piece [1], this CNBC article looks ok [2], but everything else I find is a PR piece. Oaktree b (talk) 01:00, 12 June 2023 (UTC)
- Delete. As for the two sources mentioned by Oaktree b, everything is clear on Forbes, while the second one, in my opinion, is not far off the interview and in any case cannot back up much of the information on the page. Suitskvarts (talk) 08:25, 17 June 2023 (UTC)
- Delete seems to be ref-bombed with PR coverage like what nom stated, agree with what nom stated. Karnataka (talk) 09:42, 18 June 2023 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.