Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ric Young

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was No consensus. with

♔ 18:48, 25 October 2014 (UTC)[reply

]

Ric Young

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Unable to find reliable, secondary sources which evidence the notability of this character, suggesting

WP:GNG is not met. Previously sourced to his agent and IMDB, I did verify this actors most significant role, which manages a name check as the son of a minor character--no more--in a 70K article on minor characters in the film in our encyclopedia--which doesn't suggest that WP:ENT #1 is anywhere nearby. j⚛e decker ^talk 04:18, 3 October 2014 (UTC)[reply

]

Added reference to

WP:GNG is established. Inwind (talk) 14:19, 3 October 2014 (UTC)[reply

]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of United Kingdom-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:45, 4 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:45, 4 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:45, 4 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted
to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, —Tom Morris (talk) 18:46, 10 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Comment: The Highbeam refs I've added to the article do have notable newspapers describing his work as "memorable" and "a great supporting cast ... with Brian Cox and Ric Young in particularly good form"; I'm undecided whether there is enough for a Weak Keep, but it probably needs something specific on the subject as such, particularly for a
WP:BLP. AllyD (talk) 08:06, 11 October 2014 (UTC)[reply
]

Relisted
to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, NorthAmerica¹⁰⁰⁰ 22:15, 18 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this page.