Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Richard Albertine

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's

talk page or in a deletion review

). No further edits should be made to this page.

Richard Albertine

Richard Albertine (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

No claim of notability per

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Connecticut-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 05:49, 7 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Photography-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 05:49, 7 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

• Automated comment: This AfD was not correctly
  Talk to my owner:Online 09:08, 7 December 2018 (UTC)[reply
  ]
• Comment As a photographer, he would need to meet
  WP:CREATIVE).RebeccaGreen (talk) 11:34, 7 December 2018 (UTC)[reply
  ]
• Keep has a major claim of significance as having his works in the permanent exhibitions of notable museums which means he passes
  WP:NARTIST and he has coverage in reliable sources such as the Chicago Tribune mentioned above and book reliable sources already referenced in the article including university press which is regarded as particularly notable, certainly a notable photographer that deserves to be included, thanks Atlantic306 (talk) 19:33, 7 December 2018 (UTC)[reply
  ]
• Keep as accepted as a major figure, and as displayed in exhibitions and collections. Robert McClenon (talk) 04:41, 8 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep I found that he his work was published in another book, and have expanded the article a bit. Markvs88 (talk) 13:29, 8 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep - with his works in in major collections, he passes
  WP:NARTIST.Onel5969 ^{TT me} 16:30, 8 December 2018 (UTC)[reply
  ]
• Keep: meets
  WP:CREATIVE; sufficient sourcing. K.e.coffman (talk) 18:00, 9 December 2018 (UTC)[reply
  ]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's

talk page or in a deletion review

). No further edits should be made to this page.