Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Richard D. Austin

Source: Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. j⚛e deckertalk 18:29, 21 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Richard D. Austin

Richard D. Austin (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

I found no evidence of meeting

WP:SPA in a promotional tone and has been tagged for notability for 6 years without resolution, which hopefully we can get in this AfD. Boleyn (talk) 10:27, 28 September 2014 (UTC)[reply
]

Note: This debate has been included in the
talk to me 13:19, 28 September 2014 (UTC)[reply
]
Note: This debate has been included in the
talk to me 13:19, 28 September 2014 (UTC)[reply
]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions. NorthAmerica1000 14:49, 28 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted
to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, j⚛e deckertalk 13:56, 5 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - per nom. --Why should I have a User Name? (talk) 14:13, 5 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted
to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, NorthAmerica1000 08:53, 13 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Fails

WP:GNG.Pharaoh of the Wizards (talk) 20:38, 20 October 2014 (UTC)[reply
]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's ). No further edits should be made to this page.