Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Richard De Aragues (2nd nomination)
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Sandstein 10:53, 14 December 2018 (UTC)
Richard De Aragues
AfDs for this article:
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- Richard De Aragues (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Unsourced stub that does not meet
]- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 11:55, 7 December 2018 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of England-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 11:55, 7 December 2018 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 11:56, 7 December 2018 (UTC)
- Comment: As a film director, he would need to meet WP:DIRECTOR? He has made a few other things (eg 2 episodes of a series), but most coverage is in relation to TT3D - apart from one article which is about him as the founder of a British drone racing team called Tornado XBlades Racing[1]. There is a bit more that could be said about him, but I'm not sure if it's enough to warrant a separate article. RebeccaGreen (talk) 12:03, 7 December 2018 (UTC)]
- Redirect to TT3D: Closer to the Edge. According to the specialty guidelines noted in RebeccaGreen's comment above, a single film is enough to make the director notable. The crux is whether his single film would be considered significant or well-known. This is different than merely meeting Wikipedia notability standards. And it is subjective. I don't think that if Titanic were Cameron's only film, that would be a significant and well-known film. However, I don't believe this particular documentary meets either the significant or well-known. It would be one thing if it had been nominated for a major award, but I'm not sure that the British Independent Film Awards meets that criteria. Onel5969 TT me 15:53, 8 December 2018 (UTC)
- Delete no independent reliable sources.John Pack Lambert (talk) 05:49, 9 December 2018 (UTC)
- Delete: Definitely fails the ]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.