Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Richard Visser

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep.

SarahStierch (talk) 18:06, 12 June 2013 (UTC)[reply

]

Richard Visser

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Not notable. Not a pastry chef, but somebody with a seasonal pastry stand. Advertising. The Banner talk 19:59, 27 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nominator. 069952497a^{Comments and complaints}_{Stuff I've done} 21:48, 27 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Netherlands-related deletion discussions. Sir Rcsprinter, Bt (confer) @ 22:42, 27 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Food and drink-related deletion discussions. Sir Rcsprinter, Bt (speak) @ 22:42, 27 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Living people-related deletion discussions. Sir Rcsprinter, Bt (barney) @ 22:42, 27 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:38, 28 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Keep The man and his stand are notable per awards and coverage in reliable sources. That the food he serves is seasonal doesn't seem very relevant. Many foods are seasonal. Candleabracadabra (talk) 22:59, 28 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Visser did not win a competition, it was just a kind of random test with a bias to the region where the newspaper Algemeen Dagblad (the organiser) is sold. The Banner talk 23:38, 28 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Lots of news media sources covering this baker and his notable business. If you have a source casting doubt on the awards he's received from that paper I have no problem with that conten being noted in the article. Candleabracadabra (talk) 00:44, 29 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Second time this month I've been accused of spamming for a business I have 0 connections to. Farewell Wikipedia! Targaryen^{speak or forever remain silent} 22:38, 29 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted
to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,

czar · · 06:45, 4 June 2013 (UTC)[reply

]

Keep The sources provided may barely reach GNG, but there's more out there, e.g., [1], [2], and so on. --j⚛e decker ^talk 00:19, 6 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this page.