Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Rick Schwartz (domainer)

Source: Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete.

Spartaz Humbug! 11:53, 24 December 2017 (UTC)[reply
]

Rick Schwartz (domainer)

Rick Schwartz (domainer) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

promotional article by undeclared paid editor on domain name speculator. No evidence of notability -- the refs are pr and notices DGG ( talk ) 02:39, 16 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. L3X1 (distænt write) 02:52, 16 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions. L3X1 (distænt write) 02:52, 16 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Websites-related deletion discussions. L3X1 (distænt write) 02:52, 16 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  • Weak Delete It might be possible to write a non-promotional article, but everything except the opening sentence in the current version is promotional and would need to be replaced.
    π, ν) 22:20, 17 December 2017 (UTC)[reply
    ]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 03:05, 19 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this page.