Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Rick Stuart

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was no consensus. –Juliancolton ^Tropical ^Cyclone 00:45, 8 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Rick Stuart

Non-notable. See also #Rosalie Howarth. Andy Mabbett (User:Pigsonthewing); Andy's talk; Andy's edits 17:09, 23 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. Non-notable. And the part about him enjoying boating is totally unreferenced.
^Talk 19:37, 23 November 2008 (UTC)[reply
]

It's taken care of. Even if it were referenced, it would still be utterly trivial--unless his show is about boating, of course, which it might well be (few relevant facts ever made it into the article). Drmies (talk) 03:19, 3 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the
talk) 00:00, 24 November 2008 (UTC)[reply
]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so that consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, –Juliancolton ^Tropical ^Cyclone 01:47, 28 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Comment - if this ends up being deleted, redirect it to Ricky Stuart. There should be hatnotes here, too. - Richard Cavell (talk) 02:30, 28 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Radio-related deletion discussions. -- Raven1977 (talk) 06:46, 2 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of California-related deletion discussions. -- Raven1977 (talk) 06:46, 2 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so that consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, –Juliancolton ^Tropical ^Cyclone 00:51, 3 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Weak Delete - There is the one article out there. News archives don't show a heck of a lot. But if sourcing can be provided, this could be a keep. TastyPoutine ^{talk (if you dare) _]} 01:42, 3 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Keep I've added another reference from a major newspaper where Stuart is the focus of the article, found other more glancing coverage that would contribute to verifiability, just crosses the notability threshold. - Dravecky (talk) 19:20, 3 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Notability not substantial enough. ChildofMidnight (talk) 00:55, 4 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Keep with the addition of Dravecky's references, this article passes notability.--Rtphokie (talk) 21:12, 5 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.