Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Risingbd.com

Source: Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was no consensus. Sandstein 19:47, 7 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Risingbd.com

Risingbd.com (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This is not notable news media or is not a news media approved by the Bangladesh government. this only news related website. References are used from own and official sites. No reference was given as a significant source. Delwar • 19:01, 16 July 2019 (UTC)

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of News media-related deletion discussions. Delwar • 19:01, 16 July 2019 (UTC)
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Bangladesh-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 20:28, 16 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep this news portal not notable newspaper in Bangladesh. Not established online newspapers, Fail
    (T) 07:10, 23 July 2019 (UTC)[reply
    ]
@ • 07:34, 23 July 2019 (UTC)
@
(T) 10:22, 23 July 2019 (UTC)[reply
]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, – filelakeshoe (t / c) 🐱 08:54, 24 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Journalism-related deletion discussions. North America1000 09:31, 24 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Websites-related deletion discussions. North America1000 09:31, 24 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep- I have addded content with citation. This is a fully functional newspaper with professional journalists and is owned by a major corporation, Walton Group. Since I have added references, there are now references in the article. I am of the opinion this passes GNG.Vinegarymass911 (talk) 00:18, 25 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]
@
(T) 07:51, 28 July 2019 (UTC)[reply
]
Who cares if they are blocked by the government of Bangladesh, that's entirely irrelevant to notability guidelines.Vinegarymass911 (talk) 17:17, 28 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]
I would be cautious, the website is a news organization that covers national news in Bangladesh where the government has a record of not respecting freedom the press. The press in Bangladesh generally does not cover rival publications. The fact that it is managed by professional journalist and financed by a large corporation should indicate some importance and at least notability.Vinegarymass911 (talk) 02:10, 7 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Sandstein 14:16, 31 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this page.