Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ritik Vardhan

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was snow close/speedy delete. I'm going to snow close this one early and delete it via A7 and G11, since the article is fairly promotional and there's nothing to really show why Vardhan is notable. If anyone wants this to be reopened I'll do that, but I think the outcome is fairly clear here.

(｡◕‿◕｡) 06:32, 24 February 2015 (UTC)[reply

]

Ritik Vardhan

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Unremarkable person with unsupported claims of importance. Author has removed the Speedy tag under alternative accounts + IP, now also removed PROD. First two accounts Hrithik Vardhan (Metrolite) and Metrolite Org already banned. Block evading via 106.212.20.58 and Hritik Vardhan. KylieTastic (talk) 11:26, 23 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 17:19, 23 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Science-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 17:19, 23 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Technology-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 17:19, 23 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 17:19, 23 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Delete "A 12-year-old starts a career in technology"? Should surely be removed immediately as obvious hoax. Imaginatorium (talk) 19:16, 23 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Delete nothing in the article suggests any notability and the lack of sources may be a reflection of this. Drchriswilliams (talk) 21:13, 23 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this page.