Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/River Link

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was no consensus. Ritchie333 ^(talk) ^(cont) 16:08, 1 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

River Link

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

No evidence of significant coverage in multiple reliable independent sources (

WP:NCORP. SK2242 (talk) 15:33, 14 February 2021 (UTC)[reply

]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. SK2242 (talk) 15:33, 14 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Transportation-related deletion discussions. SK2242 (talk) 15:33, 14 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of England-related deletion discussions. SK2242 (talk) 15:33, 14 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

KEEP passes GNG.Djflem (talk) 07:21, 18 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

NCORP is the standard for companies not GNG. SK2242 (talk) 13:22, 18 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Bungle ^{(talk • contribs)} 16:29, 21 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this page.