Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Rob Frieden (2nd nomination)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. J04n(talk page) 14:45, 20 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Rob Frieden

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

At the very least we should delete most of the content in this article due to it not being backed with sources. A biography on Wikipedia is supposed to be a summary of what reliable third-party sources have said about a person and not what they have written about themselves. If we delete the content here not backed by reliable third-party sources then we get 0 sentences. I searched around - this person has published articles and been an expert commentator in their own field. I do not see publications which already present this person's biography.

One claim to notability is that this person might pass

named chair. However, I cannot find any information about the "Pioneers Chair in Telecommunications" on the Penn State website or anywhere else. Thoughts from others? Blue Rasberry (talk) 22:05, 29 November 2017 (UTC)[reply

]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletion discussions. XOR'easter (talk) 22:43, 29 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Law-related deletion discussions. XOR'easter (talk) 22:43, 29 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Keep. He does pass
WP:PROF#C5. It's the "Cable TV Pioneers Chair in Telecommunications Studies" held in 1999 by E. Stratford Smith [1] and since around 2004? by Frieden? His CV says since 1992 but I think that's actually the date he joined PSU, not the date of his named chair. And there's plenty of in-depth material about him published by his employer [2] [3] [4] [5] to use to fill out the article (it wouldn't be independent enough to count for GNG notability but we're using WP:PROF not GNG here). —David Eppstein (talk) 17:11, 30 November 2017 (UTC)[reply
]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Pennsylvania-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 03:43, 6 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 05:50, 6 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Keep -- meets
WP:PROF#C5; appears to be a noted expert in the field. K.e.coffman (talk) 03:09, 12 December 2017 (UTC)[reply
]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 13:39, 13 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this page.