Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Robert Brooks (Wisconsin politician)
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was withdrawn. clpo13(talk) 23:57, 28 January 2019 (UTC)
Robert Brooks (Wisconsin politician)
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- Robert Brooks (Wisconsin politician) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Non-notable politician, fails GNG, only coverage is WP:1E over some remarks that caused him to resign.HouseOfChange (talk) 22:58, 22 January 2019 (UTC) Withdrawing my nomination of the page for AfD. He passes NPOL so GNG is irrelevant here. Apologies. HouseOfChange (talk) 01:51, 23 January 2019 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the talk) 23:49, 22 January 2019 (UTC)]
- Note: This discussion has been included in the talk) 23:49, 22 January 2019 (UTC)]
- Note: This discussion has been included in the talk) 23:49, 22 January 2019 (UTC)]
- Keep Meets talk) 23:50, 22 January 2019 (UTC)]
- Also, not that it makes a difference under NPOL, but the subject did not resign from the legislature after those remarks, just his position as assistant majority leader in the legislature. I've added some sources to help clarify the situation. talk) 00:19, 23 January 2019 (UTC)]
- Also, not that it makes a difference under NPOL, but the subject did not resign from the legislature after those remarks, just his position as assistant majority leader in the legislature. I've added some sources to help clarify the situation.
- Keep. Article does need some improvement, yes, but he has verifiably served in a state legislature — an office that passes ]
- Bearcat and Bakazaka are correct. I should have looked more closely at NPOL before making this AfD. I will withdraw it. Apologies for my mistake. HouseOfChange (talk) 01:51, 23 January 2019 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.