Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Robert Galea

Source: Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Keep. Michig (talk) 07:21, 26 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Robert Galea

talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats
)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Unsourced, not notable through searches. Doesn't pass WP:Notability Not enough coverage through news searches. JC7V7DC5768 (talk) 01:22, 19 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. AmericanAir88 (talk) 01:43, 19 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. AmericanAir88 (talk) 01:44, 19 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Response, but not all X Factor participants have articles, and he if under https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Notability_(music) he doesn't solidly meet any of the criteria. If so it's very ambiguous. JC7V7DC5768 (talk) 02:29, 19 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Of all of the sources you posted, only one qualifies for
WP:GNG
:
  1. Catholic Digest: OK.
  2. significant coverage
    . Focuses only on one event.
  3. independent
    . Interview with the artist.
  4. secondary
    . Biography from the artist's publisher.
  5. Sandhurst Youth Ministry: Not secondary. The artist is affiliated with this organization.
  6. National Catholic Register: Not independent. Interview with the artist.
  7. Ave Maria Press: Not secondary. Biography from the artist's publisher.
  8. Aleteia: Not significant coverage. Focuses on one song release.
  9. YouTube: Not secondary. Self-published by the artist.
— Newslinger talk 09:38, 20 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the
ping me if you had replied 10:50, 19 July 2018 (UTC)[reply
]
Note: This discussion has been included in the
ping me if you had replied 10:50, 19 July 2018 (UTC)[reply
]
Note: This discussion has been included in the
ping me if you had replied 10:50, 19 July 2018 (UTC)[reply
]
Note: This discussion has been included in the
ping me if you had replied 10:50, 19 July 2018 (UTC)[reply
]
Note: This discussion has been included in the
ping me if you had replied 10:50, 19 July 2018 (UTC)[reply
]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's ). No further edits should be made to this page.