Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Rocket Mobile

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was Delete, with lots of thanks, however, to William Pietri for his kind and patient explanations to the author :) --JoanneB 00:51, 10 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Rocket Mobile

Questionable notability of company ... also advert DavidHumphreys ^{SPEAK TO ME}ABOUT _{THE THINGS I MESSED UP} 18:35, 4 June 2024 UTC [refresh]

• Keep Forgive me for my lack of understanding as I'm new. But since yesterday when I registered I've been trying to expand the pages of locales. Mainly Los Gatos, Since I'm from that area. I didnt know what Rocket Mobile was and decided to add an explanation to the company after I did some research. Now I cannot defend its notability, but for anyone else venturing to find out what the company basically does then I find the page helpful. Mike24 02:30, 5 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  • Hi, Mike. You shouldn't take this personally. We get a lot of corporate
    WP:BOLD. William Pietri 04:04, 5 July 2006 (UTC)[reply
    ]
    • Ok, thank you for the explanation. I'm not going to try and improve the page at this time, I still am trying to learn all the rules for the site so I feel it best not to try and patch anything up without knowing exactly what I'm doing. Thanks for the explanation, it makes it a bit less confusing. --Mike24 05:19, 5 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]
      • Understood. If you want, as the author you can request
        five pillars is that we don't really have firm rules; it's more about a joint effort to figure out the best way to make an encyclopedia. Still, people have already done a lot of figuring already, and you bumped into a bit of that today. Don't let that discourage you! If you end up with more questions, don't hesitate to ask me on my talk page. William Pietri 05:33, 5 July 2006 (UTC)[reply
        ]
        • Done. Thanks for your help. I was mighty confused when I came back only a minute after making the page seeing it was up for deletion. If I have any questions I'll be sure to ask! --Mike24 06:12, 5 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]
          • Wow. That was quite literally one minute from first save to AfD. Nominiator, you should consider rereading the section on
            to not bite the newcomers. William Pietri 14:05, 5 July 2006 (UTC)[reply
            ]
• Delete. No assertion of notability. -- King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 00:55, 5 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete per nom
  Librarianofages 01:28, 5 July 2006 (UTC)[reply
  ]
• Merge into Qualcomm. Green caterpillar 01:37, 5 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]
• Merge into
  talk. o.o;; 02:25, 5 July 2006 (UTC)[reply
  ]
• Delete unless article improves to meet
  WP:CORP. They make software for a Qualcomm platform but are otherwise unrelated, so a merge is inappropriate. William Pietri 04:04, 5 July 2006 (UTC)[reply
  ]
• Delete unless notability can be demonstrated. Just because it's a company does not give it automatic entry into Wikipedia ... unless it complies with
  WP:CORP -- Alias Flood 04:23, 5 July 2006 (UTC)[reply
  ]
• Delete;
  WP:CORP Walter Siegmund (talk) 05:29, 5 July 2006 (UTC)[reply
  ]
• Delete, fails
  WP:CORP — ዮም (Yom) | contribs • Talk • E 06:11, 5 July 2006 (UTC)[reply
  ]
• Delete, It's just like an advertisement. *~Daniel~* 06:28, 5 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete per nom,
  WP:CORP Crazynas ^t 20:33, 5 July 2006 (UTC)[reply
  ]
• Keep but if not modified and added to within the next month or so, delete. Kitia 20:35, 5 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete
  WP:CORP Treebark 22:16, 5 July 2006 (UTC)[reply
  ]
• Delete per all like-minded above. SM247^{My Talk} 22:56, 5 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]