Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Rocky De La Fuente
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was Keep,
WP:IAR close (NAC). SwisterTwister talk 20:37, 31 December 2015 (UTC)
]
Rocky De La Fuente
- Rocky De La Fuente (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Subject not notable per WP:NPOL. Only existing coverage outside of primary sources seems to be routine campaign press at the local level, which is insufficient for establishing notability.Ddcm8991 (talk) 18:57, 28 December 2015 (UTC)]
- Nomination withdrawn. See comments below. As nominator, I request that this be closed as Speedy Keep.--Ddcm8991 (talk) 20:27, 31 December 2015 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the (talk) 19:09, 28 December 2015 (UTC)]
- Note: This debate has been included in the (talk) 19:10, 28 December 2015 (UTC)]
- I'm not !voting yet, but will note that in addition to the local level sources he's gotten in his hometown and campaign states, he's also got non-local coverage in what I'll admit is a nonstandard source for this sort of coverage: Automotive News. -Nat Gertler (talk) 19:22, 28 December 2015 (UTC)
- Comment: Automotive News is a trade publication, which I don't think is generally considered an ]
- Also, ABC News. -Nat Gertler (talk) 19:34, 28 December 2015 (UTC)
- Keep. The subject is a candidate seeking the Democratic nomination in the trade publications are excluded from being reliable sources, and I don't think they should be excluded. --Metropolitan90 (talk) 02:51, 29 December 2015 (UTC)]
- Keep per WP:BIO with multiple reliable sources covering the topic.--TM 04:27, 29 December 2015 (UTC)]
- Keep for now at best as this seems like enough coverage for an article for now. SwisterTwister talk 06:27, 29 December 2015 (UTC)
- Keep per WP:BIO with multiple reliable sources covering the topic. New coverage from Ballot Access blog: ([8] akrewson (talk) 03:26, 30 December 2015 (UTC)]
- Keep He has widespread ballot access across a significant number of states, from that alone it is likely he will garner a notable percentage of the vote in the primaries.XavierGreen (talk) 20:04, 31 December 2015 (UTC)
- NOMINATION WITHDRAWN The people have spoken, it would seem. After further review, the non-local citations put forth by Metropolitian90 along with the ABC NEWs clip put forth by Nat Gertler have convinced me that Fuente meets the notability benchmark. Just barely, perhaps, but barely counts. I rescind my nomination.--Ddcm8991 (talk) 20:27, 31 December 2015 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.