Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Roger Wilson Dennis

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's

talk page or in a deletion review

). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was speedy keep. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 08:09, 17 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Roger Wilson Dennis

Roger Wilson Dennis (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Withdrawn Very thin coverage. GNG fail.

Note: This discussion has been included in the

talk) 04:56, 10 July 2019 (UTC)[reply

]

Note: This discussion has been included in the

talk) 04:56, 10 July 2019 (UTC)[reply

]

Note: This discussion has been included in the

talk) 04:56, 10 July 2019 (UTC)[reply

]

Note: This discussion has been included in the

talk) 04:56, 10 July 2019 (UTC)[reply

]

• Comment, Dennis' work appears to be held by
  WP:ARTIST?, but agree with nominator about the thinness of coverage. Coolabahapple (talk) 13:49, 11 July 2019 (UTC)[reply
  ]

Those are pretty small musuems, but if someone finds sources for those I would withdraw the nom. I'll have a look again using this info. The Lyman museum does not count as he was apparently the chief conservator there, according to this.

I confirmed one collection and added another source, so I'll withdraw. Thanks for the tip, Coolhabapple.

talk) 14:21, 11 July 2019 (UTC)[reply

]

• no probs:)) Coolabahapple (talk) 14:37, 11 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's

talk page or in a deletion review

). No further edits should be made to this page.