Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Rohit Raju

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep.

Remember to "ping" me 05:16, 21 March 2020 (UTC)[reply

]

Rohit Raju

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails

WP:GNG and the article relies upon a single source. Abishe (talk) 13:33, 29 February 2020 (UTC)[reply

]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Sportspeople-related deletion discussions. Abishe (talk) 13:33, 29 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Wrestling-related deletion discussions. Abishe (talk) 13:33, 29 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. Abishe (talk) 13:33, 29 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Question - did you actually perform a search before nominating? Sounds like you just looked at the sources present in the article?MPJ-DK (talk) 09:58, 1 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Delete one source is not enough to pass GNG.John Pack Lambert (talk) 21:25, 2 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

You seeme to comment strictly on the source in the article and not the general existence of sources? MPJ-DK (talk) 00:06, 3 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The policy, as I understand it, is that the existence of sources can go towards
WP:GNG, so I would say that MPJ-DK's approach is the correct one and that John Pack Lambert's reasoning is too narrow. If I am wrong about this, please let me know. Dflaw4 (talk) 03:40, 7 March 2020 (UTC)[reply
]

Keep No evidence of BEFORE; AfD is not cleanup. 10+ years professional wrestler. Meets
WP:PWBIO.--Goldsztajn (talk) 22:41, 2 March 2020 (UTC)[reply
]

Keep Obviously notable, Google reveals plenty of sources.
AFD is not cleanup. Smartyllama (talk) 20:53, 3 March 2020 (UTC)[reply
]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, 78.26 _{(spin me / revolutions)} 15:00, 9 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Keep per
WP:GNG. KartikeyaS (talk) 16:23, 18 March 2020 (UTC)[reply
]

Comment - I have asked the creator [1] to
improve the article with reliable sources. KartikeyaS (talk) 16:27, 18 March 2020 (UTC)[reply
]

Keep Passes
talk) 01:37, 21 March 2020 (UTC)[reply
]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this page.