Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Roxy Hotel (New York City)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's

talk page or in a deletion review

). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. — JJMC89 (T·C) 23:52, 12 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Roxy Hotel (New York City)

Roxy Hotel (New York City) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Does not meet

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of New York-related deletion discussions. Eastmain (talk • contribs) 22:46, 5 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete. Those sources are a mess, and I can't find anything beyond them that establishes notability. (As an aside, this is purely anecdotal, but it certainly doesn't help if I have never heard of this hotel even as an NYC resident.) —⁠烏⁠Γ ^(kaw) │ 06:19, 06 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 08:24, 6 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Architecture-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 08:24, 6 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

• Comment, alarm bells ringing when parent company (Grand Life Hotels), doesn't have a wikiarticle, goog search doesn't bring up anything useable, blog reviews, commercial hotelfinder sites, also looks like a case of
  WP:PROMOTION so is a delete. Coolabahapple (talk) 08:29, 6 May 2019 (UTC)[reply
  ]
• Delete No depth of coverage, no real sources. Earnsthearthrob (talk) 21:27, 6 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete Only trivial mentions in few reliable sources.--94rain ^Talk 12:54, 7 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete References do not meet the criteria for establishing notability, fails
  HighKing⁺⁺ 15:09, 8 May 2019 (UTC)[reply
  ]
• Delete. Lack of independent sources, most of them are just reviews and appears promotional in nature. Ajf773 (talk) 09:02, 9 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete Fails
  WP:CORP. The vast majority of references are trivial and primary. INeedSupport ^:3 15:09, 9 May 2019 (UTC)[reply
  ]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's

talk page or in a deletion review

). No further edits should be made to this page.