Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Royal Panda

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Sandstein 19:18, 5 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Royal Panda

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Not convinced this company passes

WP:NCORP. 4 out of 9 references relate to a sponsorship deal with QPR football club, and the other references leave me unconvinced. Also there are neutrality issues here: "Royal Panda has been praised for its promotions and wide selection of games". Uhooep (talk) 16:18, 12 December 2019 (UTC)[reply

]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 16:30, 12 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Malta-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 16:30, 12 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, 78.26 _{(spin me / revolutions)} 14:23, 20 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Delete trivial coverage only. DGG ( talk ) 10:10, 26 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Comment Ciao, creator so won't vote. There has been a fair amount of other coverage since creation; plenty in a Google News search. The notability part is I think a little unfair, as that's only part of the sentence and the second part criticises the company. To be fair, the criticism was toned down in an edit by someone I presume was linked to the company. Reflecting critical reception, though, isn't against NPOV — compare with most articles on films, for example. Thanks, Jjamesryan (talk | contribs) 15:00, 26 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ritchie333 ^(talk) ^(cont) 14:10, 28 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Delete I am unable to locate any
HighKing⁺⁺ 14:38, 29 December 2019 (UTC)[reply
]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this page.