Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ruaidhritopia (Welcome to Lennongrad)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. --

Ruaidhritopia (Welcome to Lennongrad) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)

Ruaidhritopia (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)

We've seen multiple versions of this. Seems to be total hoax. I can find nothing on the alleged fictional utopia, the alleged author, or any of his books, that don't look like Wiki or mirrors. Publisher looks likewise fictional. Let's get a firm AFD so we can G4 any and all future versions. Fan-1967 15:42, 11 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete - Per nom, google search gives no notable results - just wikipedia copies RyanPostlethwaite^{See the mess I've created or let's have banter} 15:49, 11 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

• Salt all mirror pages on this subject as well, there going to get recreated otherwise RyanPostlethwaite^{See the mess I've created or let's have banter} 16:49, 11 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete - no assertion of notability, no sources, and I can't find anything about the publisher online. -- Merope 15:57, 11 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete per everyone above and lack of any Google presence (zero non-WP/mirror hits for "Ruaidhritopia"). If deemed necessarily, salting is certainly an option. -- Kicking222 16:47, 11 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete per nom. The Rambling Man 17:27, 11 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]
• Speedy delete. Hoax or at best a novel self-published with a dozen copies. Ruaidhritopia has already been deleted twice. The author Popsyfeet is clearly a sock puppet of Ruaidhril (even though the latter has not been blocked). -- RHaworth 18:03, 11 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete trash. JuJube 23:45, 11 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]
• Speedy delete and salt to prevent another recreation. Philip Gronowski ^Contribs 00:25, 12 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]
• Strong Delete per nom. Wow, this is another obvious hoax I've seen today -
  Sign Here 02:00, 12 January 2007 (UTC)[reply
  ]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.