Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ruf Automobile

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's

talk page or in a deletion review

). No further edits should be made to this page.

Ruf Automobile

Ruf Automobile (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Pretty obvious advertisement, no "controversies" section or anything of the sort. Quantupediholic (talk) 12:35, 3 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 12:37, 3 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Germany-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 12:37, 3 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep - notable car mfg. Many Ruf models have their own pages with sufficient sources, so while notability is not inherited, having many notable products leads me to conclude this company deserves a page of its own. The sourcing is not great (lots of associated sources) but it only needs 2-3 good sources to pass GNG. And at least that many exist. I think the company is probably past its prime, but that does not meant it should be deleted now ‡ Єl Cid of Valencia ^talk 13:21, 3 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep: In addition to what El Cid of Valencia has said: here are the sources required to meet
  WP:GNG: [1] by Augsburger Allgemeine and [2] by Autozeitung. Yes, the article needs improvement but it is certainly on a notable topic. Modussiccandi (talk) 14:48, 3 May 2021 (UTC)[reply
  ]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's

talk page or in a deletion review

). No further edits should be made to this page.