Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Rulers.org (2nd nomination)
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Sandstein 11:52, 25 March 2018 (UTC)
Rulers.org
AfDs for this article:
- Rulers.org (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Does not satisfy
general notability. Purely a description of the system. Robert McClenon (talk) 21:54, 17 March 2018 (UTC)
]
- Note: This discussion has been included in the π, ν) 01:58, 18 March 2018 (UTC)]
- Note: This discussion has been included in the π, ν) 01:58, 18 March 2018 (UTC)]
- Delete not a notable website. π, ν) 01:58, 18 March 2018 (UTC)]
- Keep Seems somewhat WP:N. Should be given a chance. talk) 23:45, 18 March 2018 (UTC)]
- Delete. Not WP:GNG — and even if it is, it still takes more than just one GNG-worthy source to pass GNG. So no, this sourcing simply isn't good enough. Bearcat (talk) 18:54, 20 March 2018 (UTC)]
- about 69 articles in wikipedia.en refer to this database mostly as a source Wikipedia:Most-wanted articles. --Grad wits (talk) 13:45, 24 March 2018 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.