Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/S.P.A.Z.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. -- Cirt (talk) 06:24, 28 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

S.P.A.Z.

)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non-notable software game lacking GHits and GNEWS of substance. Fails to establish notability. ttonyb (talk) 01:31, 21 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Comment - Try 'space pirates and zombies' for google search instead. IMO, it shows enough (About 386,000 results) -- 91.79.78.211 (talk) 01:48, 21 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Comment – if you put that term in quotes you only get 51 results - none of which are of substance. ttonyb (talk) 02:11, 21 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the

list of video game related deletion discussions. (G·N·B·S·RS·Talk) MrKIA11 (talk) 04:41, 21 May 2011 (UTC)[reply

]

Weak delete A nice source has literally just popped up on Shack News, but a single source isn't the basis for an article. This looks like something which will get attention from sites like Rock Paper Shotgun and probably PC game magazines too, but it's been put up too early. If it is deleted then no prejudice against reinstatement should more sources appear. Someone another 23:21, 25 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Agree with Someone here. In the future, might become notable enough for inclusion, but based on my look I have not yet found those indicators. Der Wohltemperierte Fuchs^(talk) 22:20, 27 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.