Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/SIMPYC

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Promotional article, lacking notability. — Coffee // have a cup // beans // 02:54, 4 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

SIMPYC

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Unreferenced, Promotional & speculative Rathfelder (talk) 21:28, 1 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Environment-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 20:30, 5 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 20:30, 5 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Politics-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 20:30, 5 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Transportation-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 20:30, 5 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Europe-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 20:30, 5 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Delete This is an EU project, from what I can tell. There is a Europeana Record for the project, but there is nothing there that dates after 2008. The WP article was created in 2007. The project web page no longer exists. But it also doesn't seem that the project produced much that could be recorded here - two small reports, from what I can tell. The WP article probably should have waited until there was something to report. LaMona (talk) 04:15, 7 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 00:12, 8 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, — Music1201 ^talk 03:19, 15 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: final relist — Music1201 ^talk 00:28, 22 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, — Music1201 ^talk 00:28, 22 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Delete promotional spam about a failed project. Prevan (talk) 23:49, 23 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Delete, non-notable, personally I have never heard of it and I live within the EU.
Nightfury 10:43, 26 July 2016 (UTC)[reply
]

Delete as noticeably advertorial, nothing else convincing. SwisterTwister talk 19:27, 3 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this page.