Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/SURI (Suppressable Unanimous Rogue Infiltrator)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. postdlf (talk) 22:28, 9 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

SURI (Suppressable Unanimous Rogue Infiltrator)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This is a non-notable in-universe topic with no reliable sources. In fact I suspect it may be an invention of the author: the topic is not mentioned in any of the sources given nor anywhere else on the web. The content is therefore totally unsuitable for a merge, and the title is not a useful redirect. —Noiratsi (talk) 08:26, 4 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Fancruft of the sketchiest sort. As above, nothing here worth merging.TheLongTone (talk) 13:22, 4 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Philosophy-related deletion discussions. ★☆ DUCKISJAMMMY☆★ 11:23, 4 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Science-related deletion discussions. ★☆ DUCKISJAMMMY☆★ 11:23, 4 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the

list of video game-related deletion discussions. (G·N·B·S·RS·Talk) • Gene93k (talk) 15:33, 4 December 2013 (UTC)[reply

]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Fictional elements-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 15:34, 4 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. Does not seem to actually exist, or Google has never never heard of it, at least. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 15:51, 4 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Delete as not independently notable fancruft not passing
WP:NOTINHERITED. Looks hoax-y. — HELLKNOWZ ▎TALK 14:31, 5 December 2013 (UTC)[reply
]

Delete - Absolutely fancruft of a non-notable, in-unverse topic that is so trivial that it doesn't even qualify as a redirect title. ☺ · Salvidrim! · ✉ 17:34, 5 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Speedy delete per
WP:CSD#A1. 'nough said? Fleet Command (talk) 05:43, 7 December 2013 (UTC)[reply
]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this page.