Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sachin: A Hundred Hundreds Now
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Daniel (talk) 22:50, 10 January 2024 (UTC)
Sachin: A Hundred Hundreds Now
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- Sachin: A Hundred Hundreds Now (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Subject does not appear to satisfy
WP:NBOOK or appear notable enough to warrant an article. Of the three references listed (all dead), only one appears to be to an independent, reliable source, the other two appear to be simply reviews or links to book sellers. Sims2aholic8 (talk) 21:24, 3 January 2024 (UTC)
]
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 21:48, 3 January 2024 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Sportspeople-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 21:48, 3 January 2024 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Literature-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 21:48, 3 January 2024 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Cricket-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 21:48, 3 January 2024 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Sports-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 21:49, 3 January 2024 (UTC)
- Delete per nom.–Owais Al Qarni (talk) 00:51, 4 January 2024 (UTC)
- Delete per WP:GNG, even if it's about one of the biggest crickters of all time. No point redirecting to Sachin Tendulkar as it's barely mentioned at target. Joseph2302 (talk) 15:36, 6 January 2024 (UTC)]
- Delete: Fails WP:NBOOK, found insufficient coverage online. ARandomName123 (talk)Ping me! 00:26, 8 January 2024 (UTC)]
- Delete. In addition to the above, borderline WP:PROMO based on the lack of SIGCOV, especially independent SIGCOV. InvadingInvader (userpage, talk) 15:45, 8 January 2024 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.