Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sacrament (band)
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was no consensus. (
WP:NPASR). North America1000 00:59, 22 May 2016 (UTC)
]
Sacrament (band)
- Sacrament (band) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
A short review, the HM content is explained in the short Encyclopedia of CCM entry: a concert review. Fails
WP:MUSICBIO Walter Görlitz (talk) 05:08, 30 April 2016 (UTC)
]
- Keep Satisfies WP:MUSIC criterion #5 (has released two or more albums on a notable indie label - R.E.X. Records). Blackmetalbaz (talk) 12:07, 30 April 2016 (UTC)]
- R.E.X. did not have a history of more than a few years. The albums themselves were not notable and there are no sources to support notability. All of WP:MUSICBIO assumes references. Walter Görlitz (talk) 19:21, 30 April 2016 (UTC)]
- R.E.X. did not have a history of more than a few years. The albums themselves were not notable and there are no sources to support notability. All of
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Mz7 (talk) 03:09, 7 May 2016 (UTC)
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Mz7 (talk) 03:09, 7 May 2016 (UTC)
- Delete as I simply found nothing better. SwisterTwister talk 06:20, 14 May 2016 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. SwisterTwister talk 06:20, 14 May 2016 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Christianity-related deletion discussions. SwisterTwister talk 06:20, 14 May 2016 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Pennsylvania-related deletion discussions. SwisterTwister talk 06:20, 14 May 2016 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: "found nothing better" is not a valid deletion rationale. Nakon 04:27, 15 May 2016 (UTC)
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Nakon 04:27, 15 May 2016 (UTC)
Relisting comment: "found nothing better" is not a valid deletion rationale. Nakon 04:27, 15 May 2016 (UTC)
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Nakon 04:27, 15 May 2016 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.