Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sadick Assah

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Sandstein 12:40, 28 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Sadick Assah

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Declined PROD. No indication of notability. Most of the sources cited in the article are either to his own blog, or articles about other people he is associated with that mention him in passing. The two exceptions are these regurgitated press releases [1][2], which are far from significant coverage. I haven't been able to find any additional sources that would amount to a pass of the

WP:GNG. – Joe (talk) 11:13, 21 November 2017 (UTC)[reply

]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. – Joe (talk) 11:14, 21 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Ghana-related deletion discussions. – Joe (talk) 11:14, 21 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Delete and salt. This page has been killed once through speedy deletion, once through Prod, and as the nominator describes above, deserves deletion again. --Nat Gertler (talk) 16:40, 21 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. This article is of a notable person event promoter in Ghana. As said earlier on, the article is being written and edits, citings are ongoing. Please don't bite :) Kwamevaughan (talk) 17:29, 21 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

@
reliable sources
that have no connection to him. I haven't been able to find any evidence of that.

I am struck by the coincidence that you've decided to write this article just weeks after Assah himself apparently tried and failed to do so. Do you have a

conflict of interest in relation to this article? – Joe (talk) 19:58, 21 November 2017 (UTC)[reply

]

Delete articles need to be based on reliable sources about the subject, which we lack here.John Pack Lambert (talk) 00:37, 22 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Delete -- exclusively a
WP:ANYBIO; the awards are not significant and well known. Has all appearances of being a undisclosed paid work; the article's history indicates that it was started as "AfC" but then the creator moved it into mainspace themselves: [3]. Their vote at this discussion is not convincing. K.e.coffman (talk) 05:15, 23 November 2017 (UTC)[reply
]

Delete Fails
WP:GNG. L3X1 (distænt write) 17:13, 24 November 2017 (UTC)[reply
]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this page.