Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sahir Hashmi Adeeb

Source: Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was no consensus. (

non-admin closure) -- Sam Sailor Talk! 08:45, 25 September 2015 (UTC)[reply
]

Sahir Hashmi Adeeb

Sahir Hashmi Adeeb (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

My searches found nothing good at all aside from a few non-helpful blogs so there isn't even anything to suggest minimal improvement. Granted although this is a foreign subject and sources may not be easily accessible but we shouldn't keep an article like this simply because of that and there was enough time for any improvement (author's name and tone suggests a family member started this). Pinging taggers

GorgeCustersSabre. SwisterTwister talk 21:45, 4 September 2015 (UTC)[reply
]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. SwisterTwister talk 21:47, 4 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions. SwisterTwister talk 21:47, 4 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Poetry-related deletion discussions. SwisterTwister talk 21:47, 4 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep He died in 1999, internet sources may be harder to find. But he received the Hasrat Mohani Award and published a number of works. AusLondonder (talk) 22:26, 4 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, —
Talk 18:04, 11 September 2015 (UTC)[reply
]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, —
Talk 14:22, 18 September 2015 (UTC)[reply
]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's ). No further edits should be made to this page.