Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Saint-Saëns Cello Concerto

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect to List of compositions by Camille Saint-Saëns#Cello and orchestra. EdJohnston (talk) 05:00, 26 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Saint-Saëns Cello Concerto

)

No need for this page. Saint-Saëns wrote 2 cello concertos, granted, but neither of them is ever referred to as just "the Saint-Saëns Cello Concerto". We don't have similar pages for the Beethoven symphonies, the Rachmaninoff piano concertos, the Haydn sonatas ... JackofOz (talk) 01:34, 19 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Keep. Valid
disambiguation page, already tagged as such. -- Blanchardb -^{Me•MyEars•MyMouth}- timed 03:18, 19 July 2009 (UTC)[reply
]

Keep I can't say I like it -- a little overzealous on creating redirects -- but its just a disambiguation page and not a categorized article. It appears to be intended only to improve performance of the search window. The same editor also added the Haydn Cello Concerto disambig page. DavidRF (talk) 03:51, 19 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

or Redirect -- the logic below makes sense. The page was clearly added only for search window performance. DavidRF (talk) 17:00, 19 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Redirect to List of compositions by Camille Saint-Saëns. Dab pages are usually for more than two entries. Similarly redirect Haydn Cello Concerto to List of concertos by Joseph Haydn. Clarityfiend (talk) 11:01, 19 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Dabs are for two entries when neither is a primary topic, or for more than two entries regardless. -- JHunterJ (talk) 18:16, 21 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Redirect to List of compositions by Camille Saint-Saëns#Cello and orchestra, which already contains the same information as this page. Jafeluv (talk) 20:20, 19 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Redirect to the subsection within the composition list as Jafeluv suggests; elegant and clean solution. Antandrus (talk) 20:22, 19 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Redirect as above. Good idea. Nom could probably have been bold and done that without AfD sanction. Eusebeus (talk) 23:28, 19 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Close early and Redirect -- though I would put this in a different category than Beethoven symphonies, Rachmaninoff piano concertos, or Haydn piano sonatas, all of which have a large body of work on them as a whole, so a collective article on them as a group could be a great contribution. -- Myke Cuthbert (talk) 03:53, 20 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Comment: Having been around WP for 5½ years but having never initiated an AfD before now, I've learned quite a lot from the above comments. Thanks. -- JackofOz (talk) 08:51, 20 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Albums and songs-related deletion discussions. -- TexasAndroid (talk) 17:59, 21 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Disambiguations-related deletion discussions. -- TexasAndroid (talk) 17:59, 21 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Speedy Keep. Ambiguous possible article title. Disambiguation needed, and list articles are not disambiguation pages. A dab that has information that is also contained in a list article is a perfectly acceptable end state. -- JHunterJ (talk) 18:16, 21 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.