Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sakshi Malik (actor)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's

talk page or in a deletion review

). No further edits should be made to this page.

talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log

)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

References do not show the notability of the subject. Fails

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. GermanKity (talk) 13:24, 7 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. GermanKity (talk) 13:24, 7 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. GermanKity (talk) 13:24, 7 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep Speedy Keep: As a creator. I mean, seriously? By simply searching Sakshi Malik actor on Google, 68,400 news results are being displayed. Also, according to WP:NACTOR, the subject should have significant roles in multiple...productions. The subject has done roles in videos, movies, telecommericals. Also, as per the same policy, she should havea large fan base or a significant "cult" following. She has over 5 million followers alone on Instagram. There are many sources which are enough to pass
  WP:GNG and I will add them gradually to the page. --Sankoswal (talk) 13:49, 7 June 2021 (UTC)[reply
  ]

@GermanKity: I think you may not be aware with Indian languages like Hindi and Marathi. Multiple sources of the subject are available in those languages apart from English. In the article I have added a dozen more sources, which you may check and reconsider your decision so that time of the community can be utilised in other tasks. --14:42, 7 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I am aware very well with

Hindi language.GermanKity (talk) 08:17, 22 June 2021 (UTC)[reply

]

• Keep per Sankoswal, but come on dude, don't do this guy like that. The "time of the community" is being utilized regardless of this nomination, and if the nominator doesn't speak Hindi or Marathi, then they don't, but you do, so thank you, but lay off, dude. Also, just saying, "68,400 results" on a Google search means nothing if 68,000 of them are unreliable sources, passing mentions, news reposts, or spam pages. AdoTang (talk) 17:25, 7 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@AdoTang: got your overall point. By 68400 results, I meant Google News results, not hits on the search engine which is in millions. I have edited the same in original comment. --Sankoswal (talk) 17:31, 7 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 17:51, 7 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Fashion-related deletion discussions. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 17:51, 7 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep: After doing a lot of translation from Hindi, I find that the references meet the basic requirements:
  WP:BASIC tells, People are presumed notable if they have received significant coverage in multiple published secondary sources that are reliable, intellectually independent of each other, and independent of the subject. Coverage in multiple Indian newspapers and Entertainment times meet the criteria referenced. --Whiteguru (talk) 21:33, 7 June 2021 (UTC)[reply
  ]

• Comment There are no grounds at
  WP:1E might not be applicable any more. This needs more discussion. Nomadicghumakkad (talk) 12:40, 8 June 2021 (UTC)[reply
  ]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's

talk page or in a deletion review

). No further edits should be made to this page.