Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sakurai's Bell inequality

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Geschichte (talk) 07:41, 9 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Sakurai's Bell inequality

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Original research and primary sources only, not notable as a standalone topic, would propose to merge, but

Bell test experiments don't appear to need any of this. The article is based of the approach of one (highly notable) textbook but doesn't and I can't establish the notability of this specific approach to merit its own article; there is not coverage. Otherwise information is redundant and no authorship history needs to be saved and no redirect is needed. Footlessmouse (talk) 22:48, 1 November 2020 (UTC)[reply

]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Mathematics-related deletion discussions. Spiderone 23:12, 1 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Science-related deletion discussions. –Deacon Vorbis (carbon • videos) 00:12, 2 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Before I read this article, I knew it would fail
WP:NOTTEXTBOOK, complete with unencyclopedic sentences like This is ugly, but not in itself fatal.. –LaundryPizza03 (d c̄) 19:54, 2 November 2020 (UTC)[reply
]

Delete per nom and per LaundryPizza.
b} 18:58, 3 November 2020 (UTC)[reply
]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this page.