Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Salaga Senior High School

Source: Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was no consensus‎.

WP:NPASR applies. plicit 12:11, 22 March 2024 (UTC)[reply
]

Salaga Senior High School

Salaga Senior High School (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Cannot find anything notable about the school - currently an orphan article Newhaven lad (talk) 11:17, 1 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz Read! Talk! 08:04, 8 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  • Keep - There are many reports of one event where a teacher at the school shot at students and injured one. E.g.[1], but this is very much a single event. However this research paper [2] studies knowedge of cervival cancer amongst school students. This one uses the school as a case study for sculpture technique [3], PDF available here [4]. This one recruits 330 of the schools students for a mental health study [5]. This study of high school student/teacher conflict may have been predicated on the above incident.[6] and there are a few other related papers. That's a lot of published research carried out at this school, and some of it (especially the conflict study) speaks to notability of the institution itself. It has an enrolment of 1800 students and has been established for 50 years. It can be hard to find information in English on schools in some locales, but that does not mean they are not notable. The state of the article is indeed parlous, but deletion is not for cleanup. I fully understand why the nom. brought this, but it is a keep for me. Sirfurboy🏄 (talk) 08:27, 8 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz Read! Talk! 06:38, 15 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.