Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sam Hazewinkel
Source: Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was keep. (non-admin closure) BusterD (talk) 06:09, 8 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Sam Hazewinkel
- Sam Hazewinkel (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Wrestler whose biggest claim to fame was wrestling at one U.S. Olympic trial. Fails
WP:ATHLETE, specifically he has not been to "a major international amateur or professional competition at the highest level such as the Olympics." SalHamton (talk) 01:47, 1 October 2012 (UTC)[reply
]
- Comment - "will compete at the 2012 Olympics" it says. How can I know that he didn't? --talk) 02:00, 1 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep - It took me less than two minutes to find out that he did compete in the 2012 Olympics[1], which means that the nominator got no case. --talk) 02:03, 1 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep - I updated the article with his Olympic information. It took two minutes to edit. So two minutes for Mentoz86 to find the article and two minutes for me to edit the article. I suggest future deletions follow what is found at Wikipedia:Guide to deletion#Considerations - "Before nominating an article for AFD...first do the necessary homework and look for sources yourself, and invite discussion on the talk page by using the notability template..." Seems like a simple Google search could have solved this (searching 'Sam Hazewinkel 2012 olympics' in Google, the article found by Mentoz86 shows up 4th.) RonSigPi (talk) 03:14, 1 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep - It took me less than two minutes to find out that he did compete in the 2012 Olympics[1], which means that the nominator got no case. --
- Keep Per WP:NOLYMPICS, participation at the Olympics sufficient for any athlete to be notable. Churn and change (talk) 03:16, 1 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Speedy Keep - clearly should not have been nominated. All good, but should now be withdrawn/closed. Cheers, Stalwart111 (talk) 04:22, 1 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Sportspeople-related deletion discussions. — Frankie (talk) 17:18, 2 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Wrestling-related deletion discussions. — Frankie (talk) 17:18, 2 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Speedy Keep because this individual passes the first point of WP:NOLYMPICS. Northamerica1000(talk) 07:30, 5 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.