Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sanchit Sharma

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. KTC (talk) 00:35, 4 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Sanchit Sharma

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails

WP:ACTOR. Claim to notability is working in Yeh Rishta Kya Kehlata Hai. "Official webpage" of the serial does not mention him neither does the IMDb page (which is also not a reliable source). Article based on single source that is appears to be paid advertising and not credible. This page was deleted few days back on CSD. Arun Kumar SINGH (Talk) 09:43, 26 November 2015 (UTC)[reply

]

Delete - probably a case of
WP:ACTOR. I couldn't find any significant coverage and, as nom says, the only "source" in the article is a self-described paid marketing firm.--William Thweatt ^Talk^Contribs 09:54, 26 November 2015 (UTC)[reply
]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. Sam Sailor ^Talk! 14:37, 26 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. Sam Sailor ^Talk! 14:37, 26 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Delete: Article seems to be
WP:PROMOTION.Pixarh (talk) 16:58, 26 November 2015 (UTC)[reply
]

Delete - Clearly not yet notable with not only actors notability one factor but general notability (GNG) another one. SwisterTwister talk 07:51, 27 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - A clear case of
WP:TOO SOON. Could find no strong sources to prove notability. Lakun.patra (talk) 02:29, 28 November 2015 (UTC)[reply
]

Delete - Above editors have mentioned that this is a too soon issue for acting, so I looked into modeling as it says he was a former model. I didn't find anything there either, so I think this fails on both forms of possible coverage for him. — Preceding unsigned comment added by NewsTeamAssemble (talk • contribs) 17:24, 3 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Delete – Agree as above it's a case of
talk) 17:51, 3 December 2015 (UTC)[reply
]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this page.