Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Santa Clara Aquamaids
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Liz Read! Talk! 21:12, 3 October 2022 (UTC)
Santa Clara Aquamaids
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- Santa Clara Aquamaids (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
I don't think this article or subject in its current from meets the GNG. It mostly uses primary sources, only has 10,000 results on Google. The only notable person here could easily have their entries merged into their respective articles, and press coverage is limited to only around 200 results, with an even lower 21 results on Google Scholar. InvadingInvader (talk) 21:05, 26 September 2022 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Sports-related deletion discussions. InvadingInvader (talk) 21:05, 26 September 2022 (UTC)
- Delete article is long and wordy, almost promotional, for very little sourcing. No sources found that can be used. Oaktree b (talk) 22:13, 26 September 2022 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of California-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 07:49, 27 September 2022 (UTC)
- Delete per WP:TNT would apply here, as there is no salvageable encyclopedic material in the current article. Joseph2302 (talk) 08:38, 27 September 2022 (UTC)]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.