Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sara Jay (2nd nomination)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. --

Sara Jay

Sara Jay (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)

Doesn't pass WP:PORNBIO. Epbr123 22:58, 4 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep. Does meet WP:PORNBIO. Your explanations for why it doesn't pass need to be more explicit if you're going to keep proposing these mass deletions. Xihr 23:32, 4 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  • Nah. Epbr123 23:36, 4 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep. Passed WP:PORNBIO per first AfD. Nominator gives no assertion as to why subject wouldn't pass it now. And, per above response, doesn't want to. Smashville 00:27, 5 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  • Finally a comment I can argue against. If you had read WP:PORNBIO, you would have noticed that criteria 7 no longer exists. Epbr123 00:32, 5 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]
    • In that case, Delete. Smashville 00:42, 5 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete no evidence of any notabiity, completely unsourced oringinal research. If sourced, a new version can easily be created, but this version should be deleted. I don't know how this garbage ever survived an afd before.--Sefringle^Talk 03:12, 5 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete. Article does not even claim notability by any
  reliable third party. • Gene93k 03:15, 5 September 2007 (UTC)[reply
  ]
• Delete Non-notable. RS1900 10:21, 5 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete Non-notable bio. Keb25 10:59, 5 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]
• Note: This debate has been added to the WikiProject Pornography list of deletions. Tabercil 12:17, 5 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete. No evidence of notability. Tabercil 22:35, 5 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

1. Keep. Notable. The Rypcord. 13:40, 8 September 2007 (UTC) —Preceding unsigned comment added by Rypcord (talk • contribs)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.