Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sara West

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's

talk page or in a deletion review

). No further edits should be made to this page.

Sara West

Sara West (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

non notable actress, cannot find any evidence of any notability, Fails NACTOR & GNG –Dave | Davey2010^Talk 20:15, 4 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 20:18, 4 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Australia-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 20:18, 4 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep Clearly passes
  WP:NACTOR for me with major roles in the Peter Allen miniseries and the Don't Tell film. The article needs work though. Boneymau (talk) 21:40, 4 September 2019 (UTC)[reply
  ]

• One film doesn't equate to meeting NACTOR. –Dave | Davey2010^Talk 22:19, 4 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

• Thank you for that irrelevant fact. How does that relate to what Boneymau actually wrote. duffbeerforme (talk) 04:25, 5 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

• Soft delete At this time there isn’t notability for a Wikipedia article. Trillfendi (talk) 23:44, 4 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep as said above. (disclosure, article originator.) Significant roles in Don't Tell (AACTA Award, AFCA Award, FCCA Award nominations) and Peter Allen: Not the Boy Next Door (Logie nomination) are good for NACTOR. Add main cast in Winter (TV series) to make a third. On stage Babyteeth (play) makes a fourth. Dead Lucky (TV series) may be a fifth. More sources [1], [2] [3], [4], [5], [6], [7], [8], [9], [10], [11], [12]. Good for GNG. Multiple major award nominations is good for ANYBIO. Nomination and delete !vote are clearly judging on the current state of the article and not the notability of the subject (Mea Culpa, I thought a major award nomination was sufficient. But apparently not so. Not even being an Oscar nominee is good enough. That needs to change.). duffbeerforme (talk) 04:24, 5 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Add Bad Girl (2016) to the list of significant roles in notable productions. [13] [14] [15] [16]. duffbeerforme (talk) 04:53, 5 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

"Nomination and delete !vote are clearly judging on the current state of the article and not the notability of the subject"- That's utter bullshit, The article only states she's been in one film - I searched on Google News for her and that film and this was all that came up!, It's not my fault you can't properly write and source BLP articles on creation .... maybe you should do that in future and it'll save everyone's time being wasted

There's a delete !vote present so cannot withdraw however the sources finally presented indicate she does indeed meet NACTOR and GNG. –Dave | Davey2010^Talk 09:27, 5 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

You continued to stick with the claim of nothing past one film after Boneymau pointed out the tv series. Why would you do that if you were judging the subject on their notability. On another point your nomination claims no evidence of notability even though there was a properly sourced claim of notability, a nomination for her country's top acting award. How is that not evidence? I also reject your claim of inadequate blp sourcing, there was nothing in the stub that was not reliably sourced. duffbeerforme (talk) 09:52, 5 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Indeed .... I misread what Boneymau had said and I thought that was obvious in my reply!?, Up until your !vote I thought she'd only been in one film (because that's all you bothered to include in the article), IMHO an award is not in itself a warrant to an article ...., You could've included a lot more information and certainly a lot more sourcing instead of creating hopeless stubs and expecting everyone else to do the work for you. –Dave | Davey2010^Talk 11:49, 5 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep per duffbeerforme, clearly meets GNG. Bookscale (talk) 10:03, 5 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 13:39, 5 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's

talk page or in a deletion review

). No further edits should be made to this page.