Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sarah Daniels (actress)

Source: Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. lone keep argument does not substantiate how the sources indicate notability 78.26 (spin me / revolutions) 21:39, 5 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Sarah Daniels (actress)

Sarah Daniels (actress) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Apparently non-notable actress, does not meet any criterion of

WP:TOOSOON. Justlettersandnumbers (talk) 10:41, 29 March 2018 (UTC)[reply
]

Makro, could you please clarify the nature of your connection to Daniels? You appear to know her well enough to have been able to take this photograph of her in 2014. Thank you, Justlettersandnumbers (talk) 16:59, 29 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Justlettersandnumbers I work in the entertainment industry.Makro (talk) 17:59, 29 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]
@Makro - Does this mean you are a Paid contributor? reddogsix (talk) 19:07, 29 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]
No. I work with performers. I am not involved in promotion. I have never been paid to create any article.Makro (talk) 20:34, 29 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks for the clarification. reddogsix (talk) 22:08, 29 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Perhaps this article can be kept under GNG. Makro (talk) 10:27, 30 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]
How does this article meet
WP:GNG? reddogsix (talk) 15:31, 30 March 2018 (UTC)[reply
]
I was just asking if
WP:GNG was right. I'm guessing it isn't so that answers my question.Makro (talk) 16:30, 30 March 2018 (UTC)[reply
]
Note: This discussion has been included in the
missfortune 11:04, 29 March 2018 (UTC)[reply
]
Note: This discussion has been included in the
missfortune 11:04, 29 March 2018 (UTC)[reply
]
Note: This discussion has been included in the
missfortune 11:04, 29 March 2018 (UTC)[reply
]
Note: This discussion has been included in the
missfortune 11:05, 29 March 2018 (UTC)[reply
]
Note: This discussion has been included in the
missfortune 11:05, 29 March 2018 (UTC)[reply
]
Note: This discussion has been included in the
missfortune 11:05, 29 March 2018 (UTC)[reply
]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's ). No further edits should be made to this page.