Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sarah Lawrence College in popular culture

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete.

Sarah Lawrence College in popular culture

Sarah Lawrence College in popular culture (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)

Another pop culture list that is very trivial and not very notable. RobJ1981 05:40, 24 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete --
  trivia. --Haemo 06:25, 24 July 2007 (UTC)[reply
  ]
• Delete/Merge - Trivia collection -
  WP:FIVE Corpx 06:25, 24 July 2007 (UTC)[reply
  ]
• Delete Indiscriminate list, no assertion of notability. --Malcolmxl5 07:17, 24 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete as a
  directory of loosely associated topics. One of the more worthless IPC articles I've ever seen and that's saying something. Otto4711 12:38, 24 July 2007 (UTC)[reply
  ]
• Delete Yes, it's utterly pointless and ridiculous to try to make a list of every single mention in TV, film, literature, or music of a well-known college. Propaniac 13:06, 24 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete, per all the above. --Eyrian 13:51, 24 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep or merge this worthy information, but definitely add references. --
  Tally-ho! 14:25, 24 July 2007 (UTC)[reply
  ]
• Delete
  WP:ATRIV was made for a reason. Delete this along with all the other trivia articles in Category:In popular culture (as of typing, there are 120 other articles on Wikipedia like this). Spellcast 14:50, 24 July 2007 (UTC)[reply
  ]
• Delete None of these random jottings are legitimate articles. Golfcam 16:39, 24 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete. Do I even have to give a reason any more? How about "culturecruft"? (I'd better go trademark that word really quick!) Realkyhick 18:06, 24 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete As listcruft, unsourced and trivia and violation of WP:NOT a directory and triviacollection.JForget 22:45, 24 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete. The main college article has a tidy paragraph on its portrayal in popular culture and that seems sufficient If the American Psycho use is notable that could be added there. All the rest appear to be trivial. Canuckle 22:48, 24 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete all %SUBJECT% in popular culture lists, they are nothing but trivia and violate the five pillars of Wikipedia as well.
  Burntsauce 18:54, 26 July 2007 (UTC)[reply
  ]
• Hey, I hate to violate anyone's pillars, but if you want to delete all the articles nominated on Tuesday, you have to paste that on each individual discussion. As for this one, Delete but print it in the Alumni magazine. Mandsford 01:51, 27 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete. So it was mentioned a couple of times. Why, exactly, should we report on each of those occasions? Punkmorten 10:27, 27 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete -- Insignificant, trivial references. Saikokira 01:53, 28 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.