Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sarah Reed

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Feel free to merge/redirect as appropriate. Flowerparty^☀ 08:25, 14 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Sarah Reed

Sarah Reed (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)

Non-notable, auto-biographical content. Bothpath (talk) 16:01, 8 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

• weak keep. Notability is barely there. Her band has gotten some third-party coverage, seems to be on a notable label, and she seems to be borderline notable herself. In a case like this, i'd rather err on the side of caution and keep it.
  Talk 17:24, 8 April 2009 (UTC)[reply
  ]
• Keep. Musician who has performed with multiple notable bands (at least, judging by the content of the article, "The Lies" should be considered notable; we don't currently have an article but I imagine there'd be enough info to support one). In such cases it is more practical to have a separate article than maintain details of the individual members in multiple places. JulesH (talk) 17:55, 8 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
• Note: This debate has been included in the
  talk) 00:00, 9 April 2009 (UTC)[reply
  ]
• Per
  WP:MUSIC, standard practice on Wikipedia is that if a musician's notability can only be reliably sourced to a single band, then they get a redirect to that band's article rather than a standalone article — they only get a separate article if they can be properly referenced as independently notable beyond that one band. Given, thus, that only one of her bands actually has its own article (and the descriptions here are also largely failing to present much of a case that any of her prior bands actually were notable for anything more than the fact of her participation in them), redirect to The Husbands until such time as proper references can be provided that are specifically about her, rather than simply mentioning her within the context of that one band. Bearcat (talk) 22:02, 9 April 2009 (UTC)[reply
  ]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.