Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Satoshi Utsunomiya

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's

talk page or in a deletion review

). No further edits should be made to this page.

Satoshi Utsunomiya

Satoshi Utsunomiya (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Direct translation of ja-wiki article with no attribution, possible machine translation. - UtherSRG (talk) 13:27, 3 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

• Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: People, Biology, and Japan. UtherSRG (talk) 13:27, 3 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
• Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletion discussions. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 14:31, 3 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep. I’m not clear what the deletion rationale is here. If it’s a translation from ja.wiki, add the translation template to the talk page. (The ja.wiki article was created by the same user by the way). If it’s a machine translation it’s not a bad one, but tag it for improvement if you want to. There are plenty of refs and the subject seems notable. Mccapra (talk) 16:14, 3 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep per Mccapra; I don't see a notability issue with the article. jp×g🗯️ 06:53, 4 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
• KeepThere are no particular issues with the content of the article.山登 太郎 (talk) 06:06, 7 February 2024 (UTC) — 山登 太郎 (talk • contribs) has made few or no other edits outside this topic. [reply]
• Procedural keep and trout the nominator, where is the rationale? whatever machine translated or not the page is perfectly suitable for readers and the perceived translation-attribution issue could had been fixed in a matter of seconds with a tag and without starting a deletion discussion. At best,
  WP:VENUE, at worst Wikipedia:Competence is required. Cavarrone 10:26, 7 February 2024 (UTC)[reply
  ]
• Keep Being an attributed machine translation (especially of this quality) is not a reason to delete an article about a notable topic. DCsansei (talk) 14:56, 7 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep, just needed to clean up machine translated mess. Ta-tea-two-te-to (talk) 04:14, 10 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.