Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Save Our State (Australia)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. — Crisco 1492 (talk) 08:03, 27 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Save Our State (Australia)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Lack of notability as per

conflict of interest. Takerlamar (talk) 00:36, 19 May 2013 (UTC)[reply

]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Australia-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:00, 19 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:00, 19 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Keep. First, any COI from the creator is no reason to delete the page. Second, the party has been registered at state level and has contested several elections, which has generally been considered grounds for notability. And third, any searches should be conducted with "Save Our Suburbs" as the search term, since the group's greatest notoriety came under its former name. It's discussed quite extensively in this book, and a Google archives search turns up a fair bit. But, as I said, the main thing is that, as a party registered at state level for several elections, past practice has been that this guarantees notability. Frickeg (talk) 01:45, 20 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. Registered political party with a long history and plenty of sources. The Drover's Wife (talk) 18:57, 20 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this page.