Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/School and university in literature

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's

talk page or in a deletion review

). No further edits should be made to this page.

School and university in literature

School and university in literature (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

An example of indiscriminate collection. We do have an article

• Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Literature-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 19:18, 4 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
• Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Lists-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 19:19, 4 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
• Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Popular culture-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 19:19, 4 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
• Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Schools-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 19:19, 4 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
• Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Education-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 19:20, 4 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete Laughably broad and vague, Campus novel (whose list is also not great) is more than adequate to cover this. A book being set at a school is so generic a comprehensive list would be indiscriminate here. Way too many redlinks but also missing plenty of those with articles (Harry Potter?) and this provides nothing Category:Novels set in schools, etc. does not.
• Delete: I don't see the need for any type of lit that has a post-secondary school to be enumerated here. There is no critical discussion on having such an institution on the stories. Oaktree b (talk) 20:50, 4 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete Feel like the topic is broad and even fails notability. Can also cause confusion and isn't anything that is relevant to be included on Wikipedia. Noorullah (talk) 02:04, 5 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete - Another broad list that doesn't have a good reason to be here. As mentioned above there are better options. StreetcarEnjoyer (talk) 02:49, 5 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete. Unsurprisingly, this article is vintage 2002. This kind of list ended up as categories or TV Tropes articles a decade ago. -- asilvering (talk) 06:19, 5 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete. Easily
  WP:INDISCRIMINATE. Ajf773 (talk) 07:58, 5 January 2024 (UTC)[reply
  ]
• Delete per nom. SignificantPBD (talk) 15:26, 5 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete, so incredibly broad to the point of being virtually useless for the encyclopedia.
  Left guide (talk) 09:21, 8 January 2024 (UTC)[reply
  ]
• Delete per nom --Devokewater 22:08, 10 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's

talk page or in a deletion review

). No further edits should be made to this page.