Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Scooby-Doo! and the Spooky Scarecrow

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect to List of Scooby-Doo media#Direct-to-video specials. ♠PMC♠ (talk) 19:20, 30 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Scooby-Doo! and the Spooky Scarecrow

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

not notable, no significant independent coverage, does not meet

WP:NF BOVINEBOY2008 21:04, 16 May 2020 (UTC)[reply

]

Merge to List of Scooby-Doo media. If the notability guidelines are not met, this seems like a reasonable merge target. There are numerous films in the same franchise with similar lack of notability; perhaps those should be merged as well. BenKuykendall (talk) 21:10, 16 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 21:50, 16 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Comics and animation-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 21:51, 16 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 21:51, 16 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 09:00, 23 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Redirect to List of Scooby-Doo media#Direct-to-video specials, where it is already listed. Doing some basic searches turns up nothing substantial about this particular special, and there is no sourced content here that actually needs to be merged. Redirecting to the proper spot on the main list would be the most appropriate course of action, in this case. Rorshacma (talk) 14:36, 23 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Redirect per above. -2pou (talk) 17:12, 29 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this page.