Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Screaming To God
Source: Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. -
Mailer Diablo 17:54, 31 October 2007 (UTC)[reply
]
Screaming To God
- Screaming To God (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
Prodecural nom; I've just declined a speedy-delete request on this as while the article is right on the margin of an
]- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so that consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,desat 05:12, 25 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so that consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, User:Ceyockey (talk to me) 11:07, 25 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletions. —User:Ceyockey (talk to me) 11:10, 25 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Needs sources other than the band's own Myspace page. If the band were notable, there would be something to dig up. Mindraker 12:16, 25 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete unless verifiable sources are presented supporting notability. Cheers, :) Dlohcierekim 18:03, 25 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete unless verifiable sources are added. A1octopus 22:20, 26 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Confused as to why this is recommended for deletion or is considered not verifiable - google search on [stg no longer human] brings up band website - most press on this band is probably pre-internet but there are other bands who are not deleted from wikipedia who are similar in regards to genre/time frame i.e. hate dept and kevorkian death cycle LAF 19:47, 26 October 2007 —Preceding unsigned comment added by 75.51.68.246 (talk)
- There are many non verifiable sources on the web. Cheers, :) Dlohcierekim 19:20, 28 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.