Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sex differences in eyewitness memory
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Sandstein 17:47, 19 January 2022 (UTC)
Sex differences in eyewitness memory
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- Sex differences in eyewitness memory (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Prodded by
]- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Psychology-related deletion discussions. –LaundryPizza03 (dc̄) 01:09, 12 January 2022 (UTC)
- delete obvious research paper/essay. Mangoe (talk) 01:50, 12 January 2022 (UTC)
- There's no secondary sources, which makes it hard to argue that it's due in eyewitness memory, which has a lot of secondary sources in multiple areas (scientific, legal, journalism, popular opinion/public debate). Same issue for the other possible broader topic, Sex differences in memory. --Xurizuri (talk) 08:00, 12 January 2022 (UTC)
- Merge: Create a section within Sex differences in memory, if it improves the page. Multi7001 (talk) 05:34, 13 January 2022 (UTC)
- Delete: Cannot see how it can get from WP:ESSAY to an appropriately encyclopedic article. Plutonium27 (talk) 22:55, 14 January 2022 (UTC)]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.