Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Shahraban Abdullah

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's

talk page or in a deletion review

). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete‎. Xymmax ^{So let it be written} _{So let it be done} 03:43, 11 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Shahraban Abdullah

Shahraban Abdullah (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Doesn't appear to meet

• Note: This discussion has been included in the
  talk) 17:17, 27 January 2024 (UTC)[reply
  ]
• Note: This discussion has been included in the
  talk) 17:32, 27 January 2024 (UTC)[reply
  ]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Ineligible for soft deletion.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ✗plicit 23:56, 3 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

• Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 00:19, 4 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
• Comment She is the first female doctor in her field which in UAE might be quite a significant achievement. However, I cannot find
  WP:SIGCOV other than the sources already mentioned in the page. As a researcher she only (co)authored four papers. Broc (talk) 19:11, 6 February 2024 (UTC)[reply
  ]

  Delete per nom and

  NPROF Okoslavia (talk) 10:41, 10 February 2024 (UTC)[reply

  ]

• Delete. The achievement doesn't seem to have translated into in-depth coverage in reliable sources, which is the main thing we're here to evaluate. (I checked in both English and Arabic and didn't find anything; although I suppose it's possible there are Arabic sources I'm missing, that possibility isn't enough to affect my !vote.) As there's no apparent argument for an
  WP:NPROF pass, delete is the right outcome here. Extraordinary Writ (talk) 01:00, 11 February 2024 (UTC)[reply
  ]
• Delete: Not enough significant coverage to meet the requirements of notability. 1keyhole (talk) 02:59, 11 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.