Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Shahram Jahansooz

Source: Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Tone 15:30, 19 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Shahram Jahansooz

Shahram Jahansooz (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This article was created through

undisclosed paid editing and the changes since the last edit by the UPE user are minor. hujiTALK 13:18, 12 September 2019 (UTC)[reply
]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Artists-related deletion discussions. hujiTALK 13:18, 12 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Iran-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 13:42, 12 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete, accomplishments seem not to reach notability. Hyperbolick (talk) 19:42, 12 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete, resume / business directory entry. Guy (help!) 20:23, 12 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  • Comment I would tend to say delete for all of the above-mentioned reasons, but I do not read Persian so I cannot assess the sources in that language.
    talk) 22:48, 12 September 2019 (UTC)[reply
    ]
  • Delete lack of
    notability Hispring (talk) 12:00, 13 September 2019 (UTC)[reply
    ]
  • Delete - I'm going to have to say "delete" on this. Between the fact that the creator is a paid editor, to the fact that the artist's accomplishments are puffed up and promotional, for example photo festivals are not the same as important exhibitions. The article is poorly sourced, and what is there is unclear if it is significant coverage, as quite a few of the citations lead to press releases, listings, one-day shows, or 404. The Honors-and-awards are not notable, and the artist is not represented in any permanent museum collections. The subject of the article may take nice photos, but there is something questionable about a lot of the content here, which leads me to conclude that they do not meet
    WP:GNG requirements. Netherzone (talk) 17:50, 14 September 2019 (UTC)[reply
    ]
  • Delete - fails
    WP:CREATIVE. Specifically, the subject has had no solo exhibits in art gallery capitals, except a single 8-day show in Tokyo. Bearian (talk) 18:32, 16 September 2019 (UTC)[reply
    ]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's ). No further edits should be made to this page.